Skip navigation
624 Views 1 Reply Latest reply: Feb 29, 2012 10:26 PM by DavidMalicky RSS
DavidMalicky Bronze 24 posts since
Feb 19, 2009
Currently Being Moderated

Feb 26, 2012 1:45 PM

Minimizing stress oscillations near singularity

I am investigating the pull-off behavior of epoxy nodules bonded to a thin layer of silicone elastomer.  There is a sharp ~90 degree corner around the epoxy-silicone junction.  The epoxy is pulled perpendicular to the plane of the silicone.  With an elastomer, an elasto-plastic analysis is not very suitable to handle the singularity / theoretically infinite stress in the corner.


I've seen a similar study using h-elements that had a nice method to deal with the singularity.  That method used finer and finer elements in the corner to progressively simulate stress vs. distance from corner.  Based on results from very fine meshes, they choose a coarser mesh that would reliably find the stress 5 microns away from the corner.  I've tried this with Mechanica (WF 5.0) with some success, but the p-elements give a oscillatory stress that makes interpretation of the real stress curve difficult (see pic attached).  With h-elements, as the corner is approached, finer meshes simply cause the stress to level-off at higher values.


Attached is an example graph of 5 mesh refinement levels at the corner.  I don't care what the oscillations are very near the corner (< ~.003mm) but I would like to reduce the oscillations >0.003mm away.  I've tried a number of things with limited success:


- Isolate and exclude the corner elements -- no effect, with various settings (stress, stress and disp, max poly on/off and variations). 

- Finer meshes approaching the corner (max element size on corner edge) -- improvement, but oscillations remain even "far" away from the corner. 3 micron elements are better than 10 micron, but 1 micron is not necessarily better than 2-3 micron. 

- Reduce max polynomial order (2, 4): lack of convergence, oscillations larger, lower period.

- Increase max polonomial order (9): no effect as only 5-6 was needed.

- Tighter AutoGEM > settings > Limits > Angle controls.  I usually spec 150 deg and 25 deg, which give an aspect ratio of < 3.  I tried 27 deg which gave AR < 2.2 and a very even mesh, but oscillations were similar.  20 deg was worse. 

- Average the results from left/right sides, and multiple cutting planes -- not much improvement, as the average tends to pick up the extremes. 

- Tigher and looser % convergence on the analysis.  10% was better than both 3% and 20%.


Are there any known guidelines for reducing the stress oscillations approaching (but not extremely near) a singularity?  The only thing I can think of next is to use max polynomial order = 1 (h-elements); I'd do my own convergence study, and spec a much finer mesh everywhere, but I'm guessing Mechanica isn't optimized to run order = 1, and maybe other issues? 


More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (1)


  • Correct Answers - 3 points
  • Helpful Answers - 1 points