Skip navigation
Currently Being Moderated

In late 2008, The Aerospace Corporation, based in California, was asked to under­take a highly precise analysis of how electro-optical (EO) sen­sors perform in space. Specifically, engineers running STOP (Structural, Thermal, Optical Performance) analysis wanted to know whether the clarity of images returned by a space-borne EO sensor would meet stringent optics performance require­ments within the harsh temperature variations in space. The company needed to simulate how the EO sensor would act in these various extreme temperatures while in space.

 

Additionally, the researchers aimed to reduce the cost of an­alyzing the EO sensors while improving sensor performance. “About 25% of space-borne electro-optical (EO) sensor programs in both the civil and Na­tional Security Space (NSS) communities have experienced re­duced on-orbit reliability, and cost and schedule overruns of 100% or more, said David Thomas, senior project engineer with The Aerospace Corporation.

 

Elements 1.PNG

Comet's Performance Engineering Workspace

 

The Comet – PTC Creo Elements/Pro solution: a collab­orative design and analysis environment

 

Cost overruns are largely caused by delays, errors and inade­quate communication among team members and contractors in the design process. This leads to the late discovery of tech­nical problems at the hardware-build stage, when problems are more expensive and time-consuming to fix. Thomas envisioned a three-part solution:

 

  • Integrating the design/build/test processes
  • Providing engineering teams with a means to work collaboratively across discipline boundaries
  • Ensuring a high level of systems-engineering understanding across the entire team

 

At the same time, his team members wanted to automate their complex, multidisciplinary STOP analysis process, while still using their current commercial CAD and CAE tools – Creo Elements/Pro, Thermal Desktop, Nastran, Abaqus, SigFit, CODE V, Microsoft Excel and Matlab.

 

The Aerospace Corporation found its total solution in the part­nership between PTC and Comet Solutions. The integration of Comet’s desktop-based Performance Engineering Work­space with PTC’s Creo Elements/Pro 3D CAD software and other programs unified team members, allowing them to capture, automate, execute, reuse and share multidisciplinary simulation processes effectively, as the design evolved in Creo Elements/Pro.

 

Comet’s Performance Engineering Workspace provided a single, consistent view of all the project data—models, environments, processes and results. Domain experts could work within their own “sandboxes” to understand their aspect of the sensor, but also easily work together with other domain experts to gain overall system-performance insights. By automatically reusing the knowledge captured by experts in abstract, modeling-based simulation templates, manual data handoff and translation errors were eliminated, and confidence in the accuracy of analysis iterations increased significantly.

 

“An additional benefit of using Creo Elements/Pro for this project versus our legacy CAD system was the ability to cre­ate simplified representations in Creo Elements/Pro,” states Malcolm Panthaki, CTO and founder of Comet Solutions. “Simplified representations allowed the project team to eas­ily suppress geometry details—without removing the design knowledge—and analyze only key components. This reduced the time it took to complete ‘what-if’ design studies.”

 

The simplified representations also enabled the CAE analysts to create more computationally efficient structural and ther­mal models. The user could complete all of the analysis stud­ies on a single computer, without the need for multi-CPU clus­ters. Previously, lack of integration in this area—between the CAD and the downstream CAE programs—contributed to per­sistent cost and schedule overruns.

 

Satellite flight hardware program

 

As part of the EO sensor analysis project, Thomas’s team completed a major design-analysis effort on a satellite flight hardware program in less than half the previous overall de­sign evaluation cycle time by using Comet’s Performance En­gineering Workspace and Creo Elements/Pro.

 

The key factors to reducing the cycle time were:

 

  • The simulation template captured the entire process, from design concept through test data for validation, and automatically reran the entire analysis cycle as design changes were made

 

  • Comet’s bi-directional connection to Creo Elements/ Pro allowed the Aerospace team to easily run a large number of analysis-design studies while modifying both 3D geometric parameters in the Creo Elements/Pro CAD model—as well as non-geometric model parameters and the thermal environment conditions—within Comet

 

  • After each design-analysis iteration, key performance metrics were available in the Comet project dashboard for immediate visualization, so the results could be compared with the system-analysis performance requirement and metrics, which were directly captured within Comet

 

Elements 2.PNG

Simulation best practices and standard simulation processes are encapsulated within the Comet process templates to enable knowledge reuse of engineering expertise across multiple physics domains

 

Also important to the project was Comet’s abstract engineer­ing modeling technology, which allows teams to reuse auto­mated simulation processes on vastly different design con­cepts with little or no modification of the process template, reducing a huge bottleneck in the design-iteration cycle time.

 

“Because Comet’s Abstract Engineering Model (AEM) is based on a single, generic, functional view of the product and its key design components—and is not tied to any specific version of the 3D geometry associated with those components—engi­neers can create performance-simulation process templates that evaluate multiple design configurations at any desired level of fidelity,” Panthaki said.

 

A closer look at the abstract engineering model and active tags

 

The AEM (Abstract Engineering Model) spans the traditional chasm between low-fidelity modeling (using tools such as Ex­cel) and high-fidelity modeling using tools such as PTC’s Creo Elements/Pro Mechanica for finite element analysis (FEA). Results from low-fidelity calculations can be fed to down­stream, high-fidelity calculations and vice versa.

 

The AEM also allows users to create and manage multiple representations of each component in the design product structure. These rep­resentations are required for various types of downstream analyses and different physics calculations at different levels of fidelity. For example, the optics functional prescription rep­resentation of a lens element and the Creo Elements/Pro 3D CAD representation of the same component are managed simultaneously; the former is used to perform optics calcula­tions, while the latter is used for creating both the thermal and structural meshes.

 

By using a “functionally tagged,” abstract Creo Elements/ Pro model all modifications made to the geometry throughout the design process were automatically available for use downstream in the process.

 

The Aerospace Corpora­tion’s customer supplied a Creo Elements/Pro CAD model. Thomas’s team had planned to re-create the Creo Elements/ Pro model using their in-house CAD program, but they knew that losing all of the parametric data would cause delays and increase potential for errors. To avoid these problems, they decided to purchase Creo Elements/Pro, so they could take the instrument contractor’s model directly into the Comet workspace. The transition to Creo Elements/Pro was facilitated by using Comet’s Active Tag Application, which communicates directly with the Creo Elements/Pro user interface.

Elements 3.PNG

The Creo Elements/Pro model is tagged using Comet’s Active Tag Application; when changes are made to the model, the simulation template can be easily rerun with minimal rework

 

The results: time- and cost-savings using Comet and Creo Elements/Pro

The Aerospace Corporation team achieved the following re­sults on the EO sensor analysis project:

 

  • Reduced overall design-evaluation cycle time by over 50%. While this provided immediate cost- and time-savings, the greatest value came from the capture of knowledge and the ability to apply it to iterative analysis, a crucial competitive advantage

 

  • After the Comet template was developed and validated using test results, each new EO sensor analysis iteration could be performed and evaluated within a single day; the previous process required weeks to perform the same analysis

 

  • Conducted real-time design reviews, with program management and the customer directly involved via live concurrent engineering sessions, using results displayed directly within the Comet graphical user interface and Project Dashboard. All the key performance data and full 3D models and results were available for these discussions, which centered around system-level characteristics impacting the sensor behavior and performance. Collaborative engineering sessions such as these can be conducted in person as well as using web-based meeting tools, and can eliminate much of the prep time required to create static Microsoft PowerPoint and Microsoft Word documents

 

  • Eliminated most of the manual rework that usually accompanies changes to the 3D CAD geometry, which saved significant cycle time and eliminated human errors

 

  • Individual team members developed a deeper understanding of the multidisciplinary behavior of the overall system by performing more “what-if” design studies with Creo Elements/Pro

 

  • Used instant feedback on the accuracy of the simulation model, which allowed the team to quickly predict the optics design performance and adjust individual domain models to improve subsequent design iterations

 

According to Thomas, “The integrated STOP (Structural, Thermal, Optical Performance) process that we developed allows an interdisciplinary analysis that formerly took several days or weeks to perform to be completed in a single day. The savings in cost and schedule required to perform this inde­pendent assessment, due to this dramatic reduction in design cycle time, were substantial, given that six different integrated design analyses were required to complete this work.”

 

The Aerospace Corporation, based in California, provides independent technical and scientific research, development, and advisory services to United States’ national-security space programs. It operates as a federally funded research and development center for the United States Air Force, the Dept. of Defense, and other national-security agencies, and supports all national-security space programs. Projects are also conducted for civilian agen­cies, such as NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, commercial companies, universities, and in­ternational organizations in the US national interest.

 

Related Information:

 

Comments (1)
NancyPardo

NancyPardo

Member since: Nov 28, 2006

The latest on PTC product releases and industy news and events, plus a wide selection of user stories and interviews.

View NancyPardo's profile

Bookmarked By (0)